The Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act and
Domestic Partner Health Benefits Equity Act
There are currently two bills before Congress regarding
the inequity of taxing domestic partnership benefits: The Tax Equity
for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act (HR.935) and the senate co-bill,
Domestic Partnership Benefits Equity Act (S.1702). The House bill was
introduced by Jim McDermott (D-Wash) on Feb. 26, 2003 and is currently
with the House Ways and Means Committee. The senate bill was
introduced by bi-partisan cosponsors (Senators: Smith (R-OR), Chafee
(R-RI), Graham (D-FL), and Boxer (D-CA)) on Oct. 2, 2003 and is
currently with the Senate Finance Committee.
The two bills before Congress would amend the Internal
Revenue Code to end the taxation of health insurance benefits provided
to domestic partners, and treat them the same way as health benefits
provided to married couples and other dependents. The bills do not
require the provision of domestic partner benefits, they simply remove
the tax liability from domestic partnership benefits.
The inequity arises in the following way. Under
federal law married (i.e. heterosexual) employees do not pay taxes on
their employers’ contribution for health insurance costs, but people
with domestic partners (LGBT employees) do. Those who cannot afford
the extra taxes are often forced to go without health coverage for their
domestic partners. In addition, employers who provide health coverage
for domestic partners are taxed at a higher rate as their payroll taxes
are based on their employees’ taxable income. Here is an example of
how this inequity works. A married man with an income of $40,000 a
year pays taxes on $40,000, but someone with a $40,000 income and a
domestic partner who’s health insurance costs $200 per month is taxed on
$42,400 – 12 months times the health benefit plus the original income.